I think the content that popped out is a fairly well balanced piece that captures the controversy nicely without taking sides.
#The constant gardener movie pro
The debate that shaped this bit of text raged back and forth between rabidly anti-industry types and anti-film pro industry people. I can't think of another documented abuse that can be easily cited for encyclopedic perspective. There are 3 diverse examples of Rx companies supporting causes in Africa (where the story takes place) balanced against one example of abuse in Africa. I may end up adding to this article later, perhaps to clarify the book's own "criticism" of the pharm industry to balance out the "criticism" of the work. maybe I need a closer reading of the balance rules, but it seems like a gray area. I suppose under a heading of "Criticism" and "Controversy," this could be a relative complaint, but I wonder if the chain-listing of three different "pro-Third-World" programs near the end are necessary.Īt the same time, I don't feel like slighting any one particular company that could be considered a "target" of the film/book. Hey, I always thought the plot section was for a synopsis of the film and NOT a blow-by-blow account of the entire film. It might be overlong, but isn't there a way to just bulk up the other sections, instead of deleting the plot section? I actually read it and realized several things about the movie, that I didn't realize before, it seems fine just the way it is.īrowncoat101 22:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC) Overlong Plot Framing the World: Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film. "Disposable Bodies: Biocolonialism in The Constant Gardener and Dirty Pretty Things". References to use Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
0 kommentar(er)
